As an author I introduced my paper by talking about what I expected to see in the organization and I went on through my paper feeding off that topic. I discussed what I saw at the organization and discussed how the experience went and how the people interacted. I gave a summary of what the main parts of my experience was. I chose to do it this way because I forgot to do a rough draft, so I had to explain to my partner what I planned to write and organize my paper. I think I contributed a little bit to the peer reviewers essay. With both of us not being able to read each others paper, we both just had to discuss what we where going to do. I told my partner kind of how to start her paper off. Giving her some ideas on how I was opening my paper, and we discussed that. All together our peer reviews for each other was more contributing about we were going to write our papers and what aspects of the experiences we were going to put into our scene.
As a whole I think peer review is very successful and contributing. This peer review would have been a lot better if I had done a rough draft. So next time I can make sure I get a rough draft written for peer review. As a professor I thought the way our class did peer review was very good. I liked having one on one time with a partner to discuss each others paper. I think that is the best way to do peer review.
No comments:
Post a Comment